| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Aurora

Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 8491 Location: Llareggub
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:54 pm Post subject: Gas emissions reduced by changing farm animal diet |
|
|
| Quote: | The Guardian - 30/03/11
A change of diet could help flatulent farm animals reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, a study has said.
Government funded research aimed at helping farmers cut their contribution to climate change shows how to reduce the amount of methane produced by cows and sheep belching and breaking wind.
Researchers at Reading University and the Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences found that dairy cows could emit 20% less methane for every litre of milk if fed crushed rapeseed.
Article continues ... |
 _________________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emordnilap

Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 9466 Location: way out west
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe the GW gases are produced through the mouth of these animals.
An easier solution would be to cut down on farmed animal numbers. _________________ The human appears to have no idea what its ideal diet should be; has self-inflicted diet-related diseases; causes extensive environmental destruction through basic food production & creates pathogenic infestations that widely infect its food supply. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energy-village

Joined: 22 Apr 2008 Posts: 1054 Location: Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emordnilap wrote: | I believe the GW gases are produced through the mouth of these animals.
An easier solution would be to cut down on farmed animal numbers. |
If Britain is ever to reduce use of chemical fertilizers don’t we need decent quantities of farmed animals? Also, aren’t there some parts of Britain where you can do little else but graze sheep?
PS My knowledge in this area is very limited . . .
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RenewableCandy

Joined: 12 Sep 2007 Posts: 10678 Location: York
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | aren’t there some parts of Britain where you can do little else but graze sheep? |
Yer not wrong. 75% of our land is "agricultural", but only 11% is "arable". Those figs imply that yes, 64% of the UK's land area is used for grazing. Minus the tiny amount that might, for example, grow fruit (if indeed that counts as Ag and not Horticulture). _________________ Soyez réaliste. Demandez l’impossible.
Space and Spaceability
The Year-Long Lunch Break |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnB

Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 6219 Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RenewableCandy wrote: | | Yer not wrong. 75% of our land is "agricultural", but only 11% is "arable". Those figs imply that yes, 64% of the UK's land area is used for grazing. Minus the tiny amount that might, for example, grow fruit (if indeed that counts as Ag and not Horticulture). |
I thought a lot of land grew subsidies . _________________ John
Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
Permaculture UK Forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kenneal - lagger Site Admin
Joined: 20 Sep 2006 Posts: 7046 Location: Newbury, Berkshire
|
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Only to keep your food costs down, John. If we paid the full cost of production of our food farmers wouldn't need subsidies. _________________ BLOG
It is very, very, very serious indeed. This is the big one!" Professor Tim Lang, APPGOPO, 25/03/08. And he was talking about food, not oil or the economy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kenneal - lagger Site Admin
Joined: 20 Sep 2006 Posts: 7046 Location: Newbury, Berkshire
|
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| emordnilap wrote: | | I believe the GW gases are produced through the mouth of these animals. |
Methane is produced by anaerobic digestion of plant matter in the rumen of animals which is then discharged by belching.
| Quote: | | An easier solution would be to cut down on farmed animal numbers. |
This will happen as Peak Oil takes hold. The cost of fuel and feeds used in intensively farming animals will lead to much higher meat and diary prices which will, in turn, lead to lower consumption. _________________ BLOG
It is very, very, very serious indeed. This is the big one!" Professor Tim Lang, APPGOPO, 25/03/08. And he was talking about food, not oil or the economy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnB

Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 6219 Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!
|
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kenneal wrote: | | Only to keep your food costs down, John. If we paid the full cost of production of our food farmers wouldn't need subsidies. |
An organic dairy farmer I know pointed out two neighbouring former dairy farms, that are now owned by absentee owners who do nothing with them, but collect subsidies . _________________ John
Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
Permaculture UK Forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kenneal - lagger Site Admin
Joined: 20 Sep 2006 Posts: 7046 Location: Newbury, Berkshire
|
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's because it's not worth producing milk at the price paid by supermarkets, which is less than the production cost. The same is true with pork production and some beef. Farmers aren't paid a "subsidy" any more, we're paid agri-environmental payments for keeping the countryside looking nice. That's why those farmers are getting money without producing anything. _________________ BLOG
It is very, very, very serious indeed. This is the big one!" Professor Tim Lang, APPGOPO, 25/03/08. And he was talking about food, not oil or the economy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UndercoverElephant

Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 5839
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| energy-village wrote: | | emordnilap wrote: | I believe the GW gases are produced through the mouth of these animals.
An easier solution would be to cut down on farmed animal numbers. |
If Britain is ever to reduce use of chemical fertilizers don’t we need decent quantities of farmed animals?
PS My knowledge in this area is very limited . . .
 |
Are you suggesting we need the dung for fertiliser? Where did the original nutrients in the dung come from? Animals have to be provided with food....
Before industrial farming animals were needed as a power source, but not as a source of poo. There was no shortage of that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energy-village

Joined: 22 Apr 2008 Posts: 1054 Location: Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| UndercoverElephant wrote: | | energy-village wrote: | | emordnilap wrote: | I believe the GW gases are produced through the mouth of these animals.
An easier solution would be to cut down on farmed animal numbers. |
If Britain is ever to reduce use of chemical fertilizers don’t we need decent quantities of farmed animals?
PS My knowledge in this area is very limited . . .
 |
Are you suggesting we need the dung for fertiliser? Where did the original nutrients in the dung come from? Animals have to be provided with food....
Before industrial farming animals were needed as a power source, but not as a source of poo. There was no shortage of that. |
Yes (though I could be mistaken). If I recall from a course on the economic history of the medieval period, a major factor for the fertility of the soil being very low was because there were so few animals kept to provide fertiliser. Something that changed during the agricultural revolution.
To massively over simplify, the agricultural revolution (crop rotation, enclosures, new technology, breeding etc) encouraged siginificant population growth and freed up a workforce to provide a pool of labour to help fuel the industrial revolution.
If I've misunderstood, someone please enlighten me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emordnilap

Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 9466 Location: way out west
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By planting green manure crops, composting sewage, protecting soil from erosion, capturing maximum solar energy and making use of 'wild' food, animal inputs are not required.
It's also important not to let assets leave your land - giving away or selling crops means you have to replace all the substance in them. Fine in a barter situation, though everyone tends to have the same crops at the same time.  _________________ The human appears to have no idea what its ideal diet should be; has self-inflicted diet-related diseases; causes extensive environmental destruction through basic food production & creates pathogenic infestations that widely infect its food supply.
Last edited by emordnilap on Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emordnilap

Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 9466 Location: way out west
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kenneal wrote: | | emordnilap wrote: | | I believe the GW gases are produced through the mouth of these animals. |
Methane is produced by anaerobic digestion of plant matter in the rumen of animals which is then discharged by belching. |
Yes, that diagram:
| Aurora wrote: |  | would be slightly more accurate if the source of the two animal species' emissions were juxtaposed. _________________ The human appears to have no idea what its ideal diet should be; has self-inflicted diet-related diseases; causes extensive environmental destruction through basic food production & creates pathogenic infestations that widely infect its food supply. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aurora

Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 8491 Location: Llareggub
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't be daft. Most humans would never utter the words 'excuse me'.  _________________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnB

Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 6219 Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aurora wrote: | Don't be daft. Most humans would never utter the words 'excuse me'.  |
They'd blame the cow . _________________ John
Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
Permaculture UK Forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|