PowerSwitch Main Page
PowerSwitch
The UK's Peak Oil Discussion Forum & Community
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fukushima meltdown hastens decline of nuclear power
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> Nuclear Power
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13964
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They have learned nothing

Quote:
Russia and India are ramping up energy ties and will construct at least 12 new nuclear reactors by 2035. Two will be completed by 2016 at the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Russian state-owned power company Rosatom confirmed Thursday.


MAD.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it isn't already, solar will be way cheaper than nuclear before these 12 get built so one has to conclude that such deals are the result of stupidity or criminality rather than sound economics.
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13964
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Endangered Puget Sound Orca Died While Pregnant, Scientists Learn

Quote:
Over the last two and a half years we have not had any calves survive and of course 100 percent mortality in offspring is not good for future, Balcomb said.


Maybe you're wondering what's this is doing in this thread.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13964
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UK's 46 billion bid for EIB nuclear loan

Quote:
The largest chunk of infrastructure money in the UK's list is the 46bn it is seeking from the EIB for new nuclear power stations which have been hit by "funding shortages due to lack of support from utilities and private investors"

_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely the invisible hand of the market will secure privater finance for something as profitable as new nuclear without the government having to borrow from the EIB?
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13964
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

biffvernon wrote:
Surely the invisible hand of the market will secure privater finance for something as profitable as new nuclear without the government having to borrow from the EIB?


There's more to it than just 'borrowing' of course. They have to keep their friends happy too.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 9806
Location: Newbury, Berkshire

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All this money will be "raised" by the EIB which means that they will be borrowing from private investors who will be borrowing it at the low prevailing rates from other banks who don't have the money but will "print" it themselves thus putting trillions of euros into the pockets of a few already cash bloated *anking families. Why the **ck don't our government just print the money themselves? Oh! I forgot. They are in the pockets of those few already cash bloated *anking families!!
_________________
"When the last tree is cut down, and the last river has been poisoned, and the last fish has been caught, Only then will you find out that you cannot eat money". --The Cree Indians
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13964
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nuclear waste dumps bypass public approval under new UK law

Quote:
Local communities and councils can dispute the details, but cant stop the process.


Toxic waste, toxic 'laws'.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Little John



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 5658
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of the few things that could save life on earth in the coming century is if we have either several Fukushima/Chernobyl type accidents or, even, a full scale global nuclear exchange, just to so long as the mad bastards don't let them all off.

Why?

Because it would completely **** industrial civilisation up and quite probably lead to a sharp die-off of a significant portion of the global human population as a consequence of having to move out of contaminated areas as well as the inevitably major impact on various supply chains.

Meanwhile, the rest of life would move back into those contaminated areas. Sure enough, such life would be deleteriously affected by the radiation, but not half so much as it is being affected right now by having progressively nowhere to live at all.

If you think I'm talking bollocks, do some research on the internet about how wildlife and ecosystems are thriving in the depopulated areas surrounding Chernobyl, despite the radiation risks.

If the rest of life on earth could choose between temporarily elevated radiation levels such that, say, it suffered a 30% reduction in its fertility but had much greater territory available in which to be fertile versus the current situation of being pushed to the very edge of mass extinction by industrial human civilisation's rapacious and singular colonisation of all territories, I think we can safely guess which it would choose.


Last edited by Little John on Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:34 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13964
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, you're not (talking bollocks, that is).
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PS_RalphW



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 5258
Location: Cambridge

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we do have a relatively fast collapse we will have several, probably many heavily contaminated nuclear meltdown/fuel fire zones as abandoned reactors or fuel stores go up. However, they will not become long term nature reserves, because within a handful of generations, people will be so desperate for fertile land they will repopulate them and take the long term consequences (the most severe contamination will be over in a century, and science based governance a fading memory).

A hundred years from now they may resemble an early Ballardian dystopia.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13964
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It depends on numbers.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Little John



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 5658
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes.

A fast collapse would likely mean a sudden decrease in the human population. On the other side of that crash, numbers may be sufficiently depleted as to not immediately warrant re-populating heavily contaminated areas, thus giving the rest of life a respite from the erstwhile encroachment of mankind. Albeit, in the case of radiation following the collapse of reactors and/or following a nuclear conflict, a respite under less than ideal conditions.

I've got to hope for the best and a fast collapse is the best we can hope for, at least for mankind as a whole and likewise for the rest of life.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 9806
Location: Newbury, Berkshire

PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read that fungi in the Chernobyl area have been virtually wiped out and that vegetation isn't rotting as it should. This will have drastic results on fertility and will eventually lead to top soil being buried under a mat of dead but un-decomposed vegetation. Not good for food production!
_________________
"When the last tree is cut down, and the last river has been poisoned, and the last fish has been caught, Only then will you find out that you cannot eat money". --The Cree Indians
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Little John



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 5658
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kenneal - lagger wrote:
I read that fungi in the Chernobyl area have been virtually wiped out and that vegetation isn't rotting as it should. This will have drastic results on fertility and will eventually lead to top soil being buried under a mat of dead but un-decomposed vegetation. Not good for food production!
All of that may or not pertain at Chernobyl. However, it is unlikely to pertain for more than, say, a few decades and is highly unlikely to pertain for more than a century. Meanwhile, despite these obvious deleterious effects of radiation and despite the fact that this buggers up human agriculture for a century, the rest of life will have more or less re-established itself there nonetheless. Or, rather, the rest of life will have re-established itself precisely because human agriculture has been buggered up there.

Like I said previously, if the rest of life on earth could choose between temporarily elevated radiation levels such that, say, it suffered a 30% reduction in its fertility but had much greater territory available in which to be fertile versus the current situation of being pushed to the very edge of mass extinction by industrial human civilisation's rapacious and singular colonisation of all territories, I think we can safely guess which it would choose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> Nuclear Power All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 10 of 11

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group