PowerSwitch Main Page
PowerSwitch
The UK's Peak Oil Discussion Forum & Community
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Hinkley C Start up
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> Nuclear Power
View previous topic :: View next topic  

When will Hinkley C start producing electricity
before 2023
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
during 2023
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
after 2023
57%
 57%  [ 11 ]
never completed
42%
 42%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 19

Author Message
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Latest contribution to the cause from my brilliant nephew:



More of Stig's work at http://shtiggy.wordpress.com/
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stig wrote:
Spoof postcard poking fun at the recent plan by the UK chancellor George Osborne to pay a Chinese Corporation to build a new nuclear power plant at Hinkley Point in Somerset. The deal may involve a 35-year price promise where British taxpayers are forced to pay for electricity at over twice the current price of power! The PR companies hired by the Nuclear industry are strongly pushing the “low-carbon” angle which is quite misleading. A lot of emissions come from building the huge concrete buildings that house the Nuclear reactors. And lots more emissions are released in the mining, processing and transport of the uranium. Globally, uranium supply is only about 60% of demand, and future stocks will be harder to extract, so now is not a good time to start building new nuclear power stations. Nuclear power is also very expensive to set up – depriving much needed funds from efficiency efforts and renewables. Building a nuclear power station takes over a decade – we need to replace fossil-fueled power sooner than that. But the main reason to avoid new nuclear is just how unsafe it is! Fukushima proved this: if a country as careful and well-organised as Japan can have such a terrible series of disasters at Fukushima we should stay clear of this dangerous technology. For more information please see Stop Hinkley and Greenpeace International. The new Zero-Carbon Britain report is also a great source of information and it shows how we can build a fossil-free economy WITHOUT nuclear power by 2030.

_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
RenewableCandy



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 12469
Location: York

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Ambrose of Doom weighs in.
Quote:
The European Commission is close to concluding that Britain’s nuclear programme at Hinkley Point breaches EU state aid rules and may have to be revised, a move that could lead to long delays and even cause the complex deal to unravel.

_________________
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
The Price of Time
BLOG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dunno about 'close to concluding'.
In Damian Carrington's piece for the Grauniad we have:
Quote:
Almunia gave no indication of how long an investigation might take but the commission sees the government's deal with EDF, Areva and China's General Nuclear Power as complex and highly novel. An investigation is therefore likely to be in-depth to investigate all aspects of the proposals

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/dec/02/european-commission-inquiry-hinkley-point-deal?CMP=twt_gu

Complex, highly novel, in-depth and all aspects sounds a long road to kick a can down.
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
PS_RalphW



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 5267
Location: Cambridge

PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Latest infrastructure plan includes a new nuke on Anglesey.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cubes



Joined: 10 Jun 2008
Posts: 565
Location: Norfolk

PostPosted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
A few weeks ago we opined that it may be necessary to look to the EC for our salvation in the matter of the government's enthusiasm for lining EDF's palm with gold for 35 years via its intended exorbitantly-priced electricity contract for the planned Hinkley C nuclear power station.


http://www.cityunslicker.co.uk/2014/02/saved-by-european-commission-looks-like.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow! Yo for the EU Commission. There are an awful lot of words but a good many of them are going to be pretty unwelcome to the UK Government.

Like I said, It'll never be built. Wink

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/251157/251157_1507977_35_2.pdf

(Who can spot the error, twice, in paragraph 24?)
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
RenewableCandy



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 12469
Location: York

PostPosted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WHEN are people going to twig about the difference between the capacity to slap Cameron on the face (posession of at least one hand), and the work involved in slapping him once per hour? Twisted Evil
_________________
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
The Price of Time
BLOG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Correct answer, RC.

I've not heard any mention int' news about this little billet doux from Brussels. Is someone sweeping it under the carpet or are journalist just too lay to read it. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/251157/251157_1507977_35_2.pdf
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The next installment from the EU http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/07/eu-hinkley-idUSL5N0LC28L20140207

Quote:
European Union antitrust chief Joaquin Almunia said on Friday Britain must clarify why state aid is needed to build a 19 billion euro ($26 billion) nuclear plant with French state-controlled utility EDF.

"We need the UK authorities' cooperation. My intention is to be able to adopt a final decision on this before the end of the year," he told reporters in London.

The European Commission has challenged the British government's assertion that power price guarantees and state-backed loans for the Hinkley Point project are legitimate aid.

In a 68-page letter to the British government dated Dec. 18 and released last week it said the Hinkley Point contract between EDF and the government has the "potential to distort competition and affect trade between Member States".

Specifically, it said a proposed "Contract for Difference" guaranteeing prices for power the plant produces "effectively insulates" EDF and its investment partners from the market.

The government proposes guaranteeing a power price of 92.50 pounds ($150) per megawatt-hour for 35 years, which is more than twice the current market rate.

The Commission asked Britain to reply and submit any additional information within a month.

_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
RenewableCandy



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 12469
Location: York

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember also seeing a more recent installment of this fascinating saga in which the EU were saying that the UK had only answered the 1/2 of their queries: HMG had apparently told them nothing about the arrangements for handling waste. Which apparently include "sweetner" dosh to be sent to the relevant "comunities" (i.e. to local govt ejits who'll blow the lot on vanity projects).

This isn't exactly bringing out the best in human nature (myself included!) is it?..
_________________
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
The Price of Time
BLOG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, hence the bottom line: The Commission asked Britain to reply and submit any additional information within a month.
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
RenewableCandy



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 12469
Location: York

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The funny thing is, they can't. They've no idea what to do with the waste long term, since those types in Cumbria sent them packing.

As if that's not enough, the French (people, I mean, not government) have a deep-seated antipathy to permanent underground disposal, even if they can be satisfied that it's safe. Basically, You don't mess about with La Terre.
_________________
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
The Price of Time
BLOG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Labour seem to be as bad as the other lot Sad
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/feb/23/labour-edf-nuclear-power-deal-hinkley
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
biffvernon



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 18551
Location: Lincolnshire

PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ooops, not all is well in Finland. What lessons for Hinkley? http://www.ejolt.org/2014/03/is-areva-finished-in-finland/
_________________
http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> Nuclear Power All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group