PowerSwitch Main Page
PowerSwitch
The UK's Peak Oil Discussion Forum & Community
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

I suggest this RGR/Ralph troll be banned
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> Suggestion Box
View previous topic :: View next topic  

should it or shouldn't it be banned?
Yes
43%
 43%  [ 10 ]
No
26%
 26%  [ 6 ]
Don't know
17%
 17%  [ 4 ]
Don't care
8%
 8%  [ 2 ]
We should encourage similar posters
4%
 4%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 23

Author Message
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13974
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

elsewhere, woodburner wrote:
I just ignore Ralph. The collection of words in the posts seldom seem to make any sense.


I do ignore it and it's the preferred option. But otherssigh.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
clv101
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 7636

PostPosted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 12:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find it pretty easy to ignore - It's impressive he had nothing better to do over Christmas than troll our little backwater of the 'net!
_________________
PowerSwitch on Facebook | The Oil Drum | Twitter | Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13974
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

clv101 wrote:
I find it pretty easy to ignore


Well done. Others don't.

clv101 wrote:
It's impressive he had nothing better to do over Christmas than troll our little backwater of the 'net!


Yours being the final PS post of 2013 is 100 times more impressive than any one of RGR's, despite it not being in any way impressive.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Catweazle



Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 2189
Location: Little England, over the hills

PostPosted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My first instinct is that to ban people because they have different views is a terrible thing to do. RGR would have accused us of being a "Cult", expelling the "Unbelievers". However, it occurs to me that by leaving Ralph to post superficially plausible arguments that don't stand up to investigation the board is allowing a clever propangandist a platform.

The question is, do Ralphs arguments stand investigation or not ? Are we really viewing then objectively ? Or are we discounting them because of RGRs previous work ?

Surely, taking his posts apart in a logical manner would help to understand the real situation, sadly I'm not equipped to do it, but I look forward to some of the brighter members efforts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
woodburner



Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 3382

PostPosted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suspect other peoples posts would be questionable if investigated enough.
_________________
If you think the economy is more important than the environment, try holding your breath while you count your money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13974
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Catweazle wrote:
Surely, taking his posts apart in a logical manner would help to understand the real situation, sadly I'm not equipped to do it, but I look forward to some of the brighter members efforts.


Some of them already have; I suspect they may be amongst the five (so far) yesses.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
woodburner



Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 3382

PostPosted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eh oop, what do ya know, a factoid.
_________________
If you think the economy is more important than the environment, try holding your breath while you count your money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extractorfan



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 988
Location: Ricky

PostPosted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevecook172001 wrote:
My instinct is to never engage in the banning of dissent. Even if I think the dissent is stupid or, even, mischievous. I realize that there is a line in the sand for everything, even a lack of willingness to ban. but, I don't think the idiot Ralph has reached that yet.

One option could be, as I think UE has suggested, to limit the threads where he could post. I don't actually know about the logistics about that on here and whether it would be possible. Even then, though, I would be extremely reluctant.


I agree, don't ban anyone.

Infuriating though it is, other people probably read this forum and don't participate, people who view the world the same way, to ban people like that turns the discussion into a vague type of propaganda.

I enjoy watching the debate personally too, no matter how often I see the same old refutations, I don't know why.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 13974
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙

PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

extractorfan wrote:
I enjoy watching the debate


Toad elevating moment.
_________________
"Buddhists say we come back as animals and they refer to them as lesser beings. Well, animals aren’t lesser beings, they’re just like us. So I say fụck the Buddhists" - Bjork
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tpals



Joined: 01 Mar 2010
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't Ralph's comparing PO to a religious belief a further indication that he is probably RGR?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 9822
Location: Newbury, Berkshire

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One vote for "We should encourage similar posters"!! Could that be the bot/troll itself?
_________________
"When the last tree is cut down, and the last river has been poisoned, and the last fish has been caught, Only then will you find out that you cannot eat money". --The Cree Indians
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
UndercoverElephant



Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 8638
Location: south east England

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tpals wrote:
Isn't Ralph's comparing PO to a religious belief a further indication that he is probably RGR?


Yes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UndercoverElephant



Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 8638
Location: south east England

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see no point in continuing to allow a person to post who continually crows about how "peak oil never happened" while simultaneously demonstrating that he/she/it doesn't understand the basics of what was supposed to happen. This has the combined effects of irritating the people who have come here to discuss the real issues, disrupting genuine debate and misleading people who have come here to learn about peak oil having recently come across the idea. And it is all being done quite deliberately.

The truth, as everybody else here acknowledges, is that the easy oil has already been had, that a combination of rising population and declining resources are going to ensure that oil prices are only going to go higher, that fracking is nothing more than a short-term means of delaying the more serious declines and that the financial chaos that began 2008 is closely linked to the peak oil (because the financial system requires unlimited growth and peak oil makes this physically impossible.)

This truth is what "Ralph" is trying to obscure, and I see no reason why he should be allowed to do so. I do not believe in banning people just because they disagree with me, but I do believe in banning them if they have come to a board like this with the sole goal of disrupting the existing community and intentionally misleading newcomers. There are so many genuine topics for discussion here - scientific, economic, political, ideological, psychological, practical, etc... Why are we wasting our energy having to deal with a person whose sole reason for coming here is to deny that any of those debates are worth having, on the grounds that they are based on a flawed set of assumptions? If he had even the slightest genuine case, then I'd be all for allowing him to go on posting, but he doesn't. He's just like a creationist who goes on an on about how half an eye isn't any use for anything, and therefore Darwinism is nonsense.

"Ralph" is RGR.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adam2
Site Admin


Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 6217
Location: North Somerset

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

extractorfan wrote:
stevecook172001 wrote:
My instinct is to never engage in the banning of dissent. Even if I think the dissent is stupid or, even, mischievous. I realize that there is a line in the sand for everything, even a lack of willingness to ban. but, I don't think the idiot Ralph has reached that yet.

One option could be, as I think UE has suggested, to limit the threads where he could post. I don't actually know about the logistics about that on here and whether it would be possible. Even then, though, I would be extremely reluctant.


I agree, don't ban anyone.

Infuriating though it is, other people probably read this forum and don't participate, people who view the world the same way, to ban people like that turns the discussion into a vague type of propaganda.

I enjoy watching the debate personally too, no matter how often I see the same old refutations, I don't know why.


I can see the arguments either way, and yes I suspect that it is another incarnation of RGR. A ban may be going too far AT PRESENT.

Taken literaly though, I can not agree with "dont ban anyone"
I have deleted about 6 members just today !
A few of their posts remain in the "spam and abuse" or "off topic" forums mainly adverts for food preperation facilities, fake documents, payday loans, and villas to rent.
Spammers and scammers I delete without mercy or consideration or consultation.

Established members I would only ban or delete after consultation with the original admin team.
_________________
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blue Peter



Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 1936
Location: Milton Keynes

PostPosted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whilst I doubt that this applies to Ralph, or even that this little groups merits any attention, this article is quite eye-opening on the work of GCHQ to manipulate information, groups and reputations on the internet:

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/


Peter.
_________________
Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the seconds to hours?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> Suggestion Box All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group