PowerSwitch Main Page
PowerSwitch
The UK's Peak Oil Discussion Forum & Community
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Database outage Fri 10 July - posting now re-enabled

TEQs and Fee and Dividend

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> TEQs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tom



Joined: 25 Feb 2016
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 12:25 pm    Post subject: TEQs and Fee and Dividend Reply with quote
Can anyone out there give a good comparison between the two schemes, TEQs and Fee and Dividend? Which might work best, especially for the less well-off?
_________________
Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shaun Chamberlin



Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 120
Location: London
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Here you go Tom:
http://www.darkoptimism.org/2015/12/21/fee-and-dividend-or-teqs/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
johnhemming2



Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 2159
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
In many ways the current glut is an argument for TEQs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
emordnilap



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 14617
Location: Houǝsʇlʎ' ᴉʇ,s ɹǝɐllʎ uoʇ ʍoɹʇɥ ʇɥǝ ǝɟɟoɹʇ' pou,ʇ ǝʌǝu qoʇɥǝɹ˙
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Shaun Chamberlin wrote:
Here you go Tom:
http://www.darkoptimism.org/2015/12/21/fee-and-dividend-or-teqs/


Shaun, this to me is such an important bit, worth repeating:

Quote:
Lets start with why both TEQs and F&D are excellent ideas that would represent a radical break from the status quo.

Both are ways of ensuring that society finally gets serious about addressing our climate challenge, neither is open to the extensive corporate windfalls that characterise existing Cap and Trade schemes (which have no effective cap, and thus are really just Trade schemes) and both would protect the poorest in society as energy prices rise to take account of the impact of the carbon therein.


Something has to be done. I've said for years, anything that actually, physically mitigates humans' negative effects on the biosphere is a Good Thing, so F&D, TEQs, whatever, gimme. We're still a long way off even talking about the problem properly (outside PS).

However, in's worth remembering (firstly) there's been a shift in public attitudes towards politicians here in Ireland, with an unorganised left-leaning rump gaining a significant number of seats in the last election; (secondly) it's similar to Corbyn's rise to prominence (and possibly Sanders'). You can only hope that climate change action (if it ever arrives) will follow a similar path, favouring downstream solutions. Ireland's favoured solution, C&S, is somewhat upstream of course. Gimme that!
_________________
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> TEQs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group