PowerSwitch Main Page
PowerSwitch
The UK's Peak Oil Discussion Forum & Community
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Government funds tram extension

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> Transport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 11366
Location: Newbury, Berkshire

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 5:40 pm    Post subject: Government funds tram extension Reply with quote

The government isn't all bad. They're putting £60million into the Birmingham tram system.
_________________
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 11366
Location: Newbury, Berkshire

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And they're funding the extension of the Coastal path for the 2700 miles right round England.

Sounds like they want to give us something to do in the hols so that we don't miss going to Europe after Brexit!! Wink
_________________
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
cubes



Joined: 10 Jun 2008
Posts: 691
Location: Norfolk

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

£12m a stop! gold plated tramways? Wait, it's more than double that it's just the governments contribution Surprised Why is it costing £150m?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adam2
Site Admin


Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 7346
Location: North Somerset

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cubes wrote:
£12m a stop! gold plated tramways? Wait, it's more than double that it's just the governments contribution Surprised Why is it costing £150m?


Disabled access, elfansafety, consultations, reviews.

These schemes are not traditional low technology trams, but are more like railways that run in the street.
An old fashioned tram was a vehicle that in general design resembled a bus, but that ran on rails embedded in the street surface. They stopped at tram stops that consisted of a simple sign affixed to a post, just like a bus stop.
Todays trams are hugely complicated vehicles and the tram stops are more like small rail railway stations with raised platforms.
_________________
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnhemming2



Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 2159

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

adam2 wrote:
These schemes are not traditional low technology trams, but are more like railways that run in the street.

That is why I am not enthusiastic about light rail. Trolley buses are OK, but trams as they now are often undermine buses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 11366
Location: Newbury, Berkshire

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

johnhemming2 wrote:
adam2 wrote:
These schemes are not traditional low technology trams, but are more like railways that run in the street.

That is why I am not enthusiastic about light rail. Trolley buses are OK, but trams as they now are often undermine buses.


The trouble is that we are not designing, as far as I know, an integrated transport scheme. Buses should feed into light rail and heavy rail and light rail and buses should feed into the heavy rail system. They should radiate outwards on their return journeys. The Croydon tram system does feed into the heavy rail system at East Croydon but I think it does so in competition with local buses rather then the buses being a feeder into the light rail system.

The buses could also be smaller, lighter single deck buses running at closer intervals but that would cost more as more drivers would be required; good for employment but not for costs so no chance with that proposal!

Some of the drive for tram stations comes from the requirement to provide level access for the disabled and prams. Would it be cheaper to provide a hoist on each tram for the occasional wheel chair/large pram user or to build a station at each stop? While I'm on the subject, we have had altercations locally between the occasional wheel chair user and the less occasional pram user both competing for the limited space allocated for both uses. If the buses were more frequent this wouldn't be such a problem.
_________________
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
fuzzy



Joined: 29 Nov 2013
Posts: 950
Location: The Marches, UK

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

johnhemming2 wrote:
adam2 wrote:
These schemes are not traditional low technology trams, but are more like railways that run in the street.

That is why I am not enthusiastic about light rail. Trolley buses are OK, but trams as they now are often undermine buses.


and bicycles, trams are their enemy.

In wolverhampton they have trams that cross the middle of traffic roundabouts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PowerSwitch Forum Index -> Transport All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group