None of [the major papers] thought that the IPCC's statement that the Himalayan glaciers would likely melt by 2035 was in itself worth mentioning, let alone basing a story around. So how much effort should the same papers spend reporting on the withdrawal of this claim? That depends on whether...
-Defusing the Methane Greenhouse Time Bomb -Think-tanks take oil money and use it to fund climate deniers -China: Prince of Denmark -Loss Of Species Hits Economy
